From this week’s After Deadline (my favorite NYtimes.com feature):
My colleague Adam Bryant, an editor in Business, notes that business writers tend to reach for metaphors to try to make complicated aspects of finance and economic policy more accessible. It’s the right instinct, but as Adam says, problems can arise when we mix and match metaphors in a single sentence or paragraph.
In recent weeks, we have printed sentences about …
… a stew of programs, some with warts and all.
… assets that are hanging over a bank and need to be purged.
… acquisitions that are absorbed and then molded into a giant.
… unplugging a stoppage by shoring up something.
You get the idea.
![meganwest:
Regardless, all of the photo research that this article required brought me to my new favorite game that I’d love to share with you. It’s called “Nicolas Cage.” Unlike my associate, Gladstone’s game, this one isn’t complicated or Facebook-related (also, it’s fun).
Here’s how you play:
Step 1: Get a screengrab from a Nicolas Cage movie. Doesn’t matter what movie or how much facial hair Nicolas Cage has.
Step 2: Think of a line of dialogue, [Two Sentence Maximum] for Nicolas Cage. This line must, in your opinion (A) sum up the movie and (B) be just retarded enough that it might actually be a real line from a Nicolas Cage film.
Step 3: Superimpose that line over the picture.
Step 4: That is the entire game.
[link]
Not only is this an excellent game, but Gone in 60 Seconds is AWESOME (and by awesome, I mean awful) when it comes to the whole stealing cars/sex metaphor. Click here for the best clip from the movie.](http://22.media.tumblr.com/MgwTXQ7QwkqyvqbhtCAfYF9Lo1_400.jpg)

